As we aren’t warming, to think that matlab ice may continue to decrease makes no sense in any respect. To insist on ice decreases when matlab information show that matlab Arctic Rim has NOT been warming as claimed is to border on, say, an unwillingness to accept matlab certainly likelihood engineering matlab natural condition. Paul Daniel Ash – real scientists would not extrapolate engineering style from three many years of size – they could look to matlab opportunity of cycles – long run, along with when matlab Vikings settled in Greenland 1000 years ago, and during matlab Little Ice Age in matlab 1600s, and matlab rate of healing from then, plus matlab shorter term Pacific Decadal Oscillation 30 years and North Atlantic Oscillation/Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation as well as matlab 70 year Arctic Oscillation – if you happen to combine all of these and look at their stages of teleconnection – THEN you are engineering real Arctic scientist – like Professor Polyakov at Fairbanks University – who warns about sampling errors if you don’t take account of low frequency cycles – pointing then to matlab many station data in 1940. The cycles have an effect on ocean warm water incursion from matlab Atlantic – melting matlab ice from under, and clouds from matlab Pacific, melting matlab from above – winds do matlab rest. Summer air temperatures beyond 80N haven’t multiple by much. There is no direct evidence of CO2 riding matlab ice loss.